Next time you encounter a BLM member, ask them a very serious question:
The Prophet Muhammad owned slaves! In our culturally-sensitive times, shouldn’t organizations like BLM be picketing mosques? Shouldn’t they demand statues and buildings named for the Prophet Muhammad be removed or renamed?
Here’s an excerpt from the BBC acknowledging this fact:
“The Prophet Muhammad did not try to abolish slavery, and bought, sold, captured, and owned slaves himself. But he insisted that slave owners treat their slaves well and stressed the virtue of freeing slaves.”
“writers argue that by regulating slavery the Prophet gave his authority to its continued existence, and that by having slaves himself he showed his approval.”
In fact, it was those “white devils” who gradually persuaded the Moslems to stop slave trading:
“The Arab slave trade was most active in West Asia, North Africa, and Southeast Africa. Muslim traders exported as many as 17 million slaves to the coast of the Indian Ocean, the Middle East, and North Africa. In the early 20th century (post World War I), slavery was gradually outlawed and suppressed in Muslim lands, largely due to pressure exerted by Western nations such as Britain and France.”
So let them explain why they aren’t protesting at mosques and Islamic centers and watch their heads explode.