Select Page

With its case for America being founded entirely on the idea of perpetrating slavery meeting pushback and as factual history falling apart, the New York Times is  now very, very quietly trying weasel out of the worst claims of its “1619” project, hoping no one is going to notice.

 

According to the Washington Examiner’s Becket Adams:

 

New York Times Magazine editors have quietly removed controversial language from the online version of Hannah-Jones’s 1619 Project, a package of essays that argue chattel slavery defines America’s founding. Hannah-Jones herself also asserts now that the project’s core thesis is not what she and everyone else involved originally said it was.

 

It “does not argue that 1619 is our true founding,” she said on Friday. She declared elsewhere in July that it “doesn’t argue, for obvious reasons, that 1619 is our true founding.”

 

This is a brazen lie. When the 1619 Project debuted both online and in print in August 2019, the online version’s text stated originally [emphasis added]:

 

The 1619 project is a major initiative from The New York Times observing the 400th anniversary of the beginning of American slavery. It aims to reframe the country’s history, understanding 1619 as our true founding, and placing the consequences of slavery and the contributions of black Americans at the very center of our national narrative.

 

That same online passage, which was the source of so much controversy among historians on both sides of the aisle, now reads:

 

(Excerpt) Read more at:

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/09/nevermind_the_new_york_times_goes_emily_litella_on_its_garbage_1619_project.html

Copyright © 2013 - 2020 West Wave Publishing, LTD